AOD-9604
AOD9604, hGH fragment 176-191 (modified), Tyr-hGH(177-191), "anti-obesity drug 9604"
1What it is
AOD-9604 is a man-made copy of the tail end of human growth hormone. In the 1990s, researchers at Monash University in Melbourne noticed that this C-terminal region of GH seemed to carry the hormone's fat-burning activity while the rest of the molecule carried its growth and blood-sugar effects. The Australian company Metabolic Pharmaceuticals developed a stabilised version — the natural fragment 176–191 with an extra tyrosine — and took it through a full clinical programme for obesity between roughly 1999 and 2007.
The programme failed. The largest Phase 2b trials did not show a statistically significant difference in weight loss from placebo, and the company stopped development. The compound then resurfaced as a food-ingredient candidate (the company self-affirmed GRAS status in the US in 2014) and as a community peptide. More recently it has been studied in animals for cartilage repair.
2How it's thought to work
3What the research shows
Weight loss in humans
Human safety
Fat metabolism in rodents
Cartilage repair and osteoarthritis
Early human pharmacology
Body composition, recovery, "fat loss without diet"
4Reported side effects and interactions
Literature-reported
Oral doses up to 30 mg/day for 12 weeks produced no safety signals different from placebo across ~900 trial participants (Stier 2013). No change in IGF-1, glucose or insulin.Community-reported
injection-site irritation, headache, occasional nausea; some report mild water retention. Many report no noticeable effect at all.Theoretical. because it does not engage the GH receptor, GH-class concerns (IGF-1 rise, insulin resistance) should not apply — and the trial data support this. Long-term injectable use has never been studied.
Interactions. none established. Fat-mobilising effect, if present, would in theory be influenced by β-blockers (which blunt β3 signalling), but this has not been tested.
Markers researchers commonly monitor
| Marker | Why it's watched |
|---|---|
| IGF-1 | expected not to change; a rise would suggest contamination with GH or a GH secretagogue rather than AOD-9604. |
| Fasting glucose and insulin | trials showed no effect; worth confirming given the GH-derived origin. |
| Lipid panel and free fatty acids | the proposed lipolytic effect would show here if it exists. |
| Body weight and waist circumference | the only meaningful efficacy readouts, and the ones that disappointed in trials. |
| No compound-specific safety markers are established; general baseline panels (CBC, CMP) are reasonable |
Free for everyone. Safety information is never behind a paywall.
5Reconstitution and handling
Typically supplied as powder in 2 mg or 5 mg vials. with , swirl gently, protect from light. Community practice favours morning fasted dosing on the theory that it works best when insulin is low; this is not supported by human data.
Open in calculator, pre-loaded →6Commonly studied alongside
In the literature: hyaluronic acid (cartilage models). In the community: discussed with GH secretagogues (ipamorelin, CJC-1295) and with other "fat-loss" peptides such as tesamorelin or 5-amino-1MQ; no combined studies exist.
Informational cross-links. Not stack recommendations.
7Regulatory status by region
| Region | Status (checked —) |
|---|---|
| United States | Not FDA-approved as a drug. Placed in Category 2 of FDA's compounding bulk substances list (2023), restricting compounding. The company's 2014 GRAS self-affirmation as a food ingredient was not an FDA approval † |
| European Union | Not authorised; not a permitted novel food ingredient |
| United Kingdom | Not licensed |
| Australia | Not an approved product despite its Australian origin; prescription-only classification for peptides applies † |
| South Africa | Not registered |
| Sport | Prohibited by WADA under S2 (growth hormone fragments are named explicitly, including AOD-9604) |
8Open questions
- Why did strong rodent lipolysis fail to translate into human weight loss? Species differences in β3-adrenergic receptor biology are the leading explanation.
- Does injectable (rather than oral) dosing change the human result? Never tested at scale.
- Is the cartilage signal real in humans? No trial exists.
- Does research-market material match the clinical-trial molecule (with its disulphide bond intact)? Degradation of the bond would be expected to abolish activity.
9References
- 1Ng FM et al. (2000). Metabolic studies of a synthetic lipolytic domain (AOD9604) of human growth hormone. Horm Res. PubMed · DOI
- 2Heffernan M et al. (2001). The effects of human GH and its lipolytic fragment (AOD9604) on lipid metabolism following chronic treatment in obese mice and β3-AR knock-out mice. Endocrinology. PubMed · DOI
- 3Stier H, Vos E, Kenley D (2013). Safety and tolerability of the hexadecapeptide AOD9604 in humans. J Endocrinol Metab. DOI
- 4Kwon DR, Kim YG (2015). Effects of intra-articular injection of AOD9604 with or without hyaluronic acid in a rabbit model of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rehabil Med. PubMed
- 5Heffernan MA et al. (2001). Increase of fat oxidation and weight loss in obese mice caused by chronic treatment with human growth hormone or a modified C-terminal fragment. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. PubMed · DOI
- 6FDA (2023). Bulk drug substances for compounding — AOD-9604 category 2 listing. PubMed
References are being resolved to PubMed/DOI identifiers; links search PubMed for the citation until then.
† Being confirmed by our reviewers against current sources.
10Community
Threads and protocols are visible to members. Joining is free.
Self-reported side effects Phase 2
11Page history
Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Found an error? Report it · Editorial standards — corrections are logged here.